<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>abstraction on Sparse Notes</title>
    <link>https://sparsenotes.com/tags/abstraction/</link>
    <description>Recent content in abstraction on Sparse Notes</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sparsenotes.com/tags/abstraction/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Code Matters: Reflections on Rust in the LLM Age (Bryan Cantrill)</title>
      <link>https://sparsenotes.com/posts/2026/11/code-matters-rust-llm-age-bryan-cantrill/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://sparsenotes.com/posts/2026/11/code-matters-rust-llm-age-bryan-cantrill/</guid>
      <description>Bryan Cantrill argues that Rust succeeded by optimising for the artifact rather than the developer, that the same choice makes it a strong target for LLM-generated code, and that LLMs&amp;#39; lack of laziness makes them bad at the thing that matters most: creating abstractions.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
